| Stu's Weblog | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Sun, 01 Jun 2003 Something I had long given up hoping for: the first signs of a healthily competitive online music business. Good to see Franks already working hard on his legacy: How Tommy Franks won the Iraq war Swarm crime could be the killer app to drive a more even distribution of technology. US army continues attempts to seduce geekish doves. The title: “The Simulation Argument: Why the Probability that You Are Living in a Matrix is Quite High” is strange as the first paragraph directly contradicts it: “The Matrix got many otherwise not-so-philosophical minds ruminating on the nature of reality. But the scenario depicted in the movie is ridiculous: human brains being kept in tanks by intelligent machines just to produce power.” Nevertheless, this is interesting stuff. Now we get to the core of the simulation argument. This does not purport to demonstrate that you are in a simulation. Instead, it shows that we should accept as true at least one of the following three propositions: These arguments assume finite computational power. If you also consider the possibility of infinite computational power and infinite storage (a real stretch, I know) then simulations could be recursive. The probability of being in a simulation becomes even higher and our ‘God’ is also probably in a simulation. Via Slashdot Palm look like they have a clue:
Then show that they don’t:
Instead of? [/technology] posted at 11:31 # |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||