| Stu's Weblog | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Sun, 19 Jan 2003 I use almost exclusively open source software. There are many reason for this, the most important being my intolerance of unjustified crapiness (if my computer is pissing me off I want an excuse and a solution). Another major advantage of open code is the ability to audit the code. Now you can check that, for example, your computer is not CCing your emails to the FBI or your plan(s) for world domination to Bill Gates. Except that unless you’re a programmer, you won’t understand the code and therefore you can’t. So where is the benefit for non-programmers? A slightly bizarre comparision I like is to a mute man choosing which country he should claim asylum in. He can’t speak so what use is freedom of speech to him? Others will speak for him, helping to ensure his liberty. Others will audit code for you, helping to ensure your security. [/technology] posted at 14:41 # |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||