| Stu's Weblog | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Sun, 25 May 2003 An Economist article on how badly countries tend to handle mineral wealth and how accounting disclosure rules (“Publish What You Pay”) for big oil companies should help third world development. The Publish What You Pay folks look like something quite rare. Well thought out, realistic, targetted activism.
Notes on (the Politics of) Eurovision
I’ve come to the conclusion that the Eurovision Song contest is worth watching at least once every few years, as long as you follow three rules:
Most of the songs are so bad that and the public’s bias so strong that the only way to explain much of the voting is in the context of political history. This is widely discussed inside of Europe but is probably missed by those looking in. Time have an article from last year:
There is also a more comprehensive statistical analysis:
If you get bored of watching it from this perspective you can also consider the possibility of bribery and which countries would care enough - about the potential positive PR - to do it. I think Jeremy Zawodny is jumping the gun - he admits the possibility himself, but I like unusual adaptions of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle too much for that to count against him.
More Blogosphere-Gaining-Self-Awareness going on as Kalsey [/technology] posted at 14:17 # Free (although very experimental) music over at Opsound. This is via an interesting article over at Creative Commons to promote alternate copyright licenses. I’m listening to this right now and it’s ambient city noise. Literally. It could be relaxing. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||